Habitus – A Collective Dialogue by Kamal Badhey

Goldsmiths Sociology students can be seen sitting in New Cross House after a lecture, huddled around classmate Yinae Deowyoo Hwangs Hasselblad SWC/m. Each of them pass around the camera, fiddling with its mechanics, deeply engrossed in its explanation. Minutes later, topics switch. Someone is talking about their childhood obsession with maps, hyper gentrification in Williamsburg Brooklyn, and the meaning of Blacknessin England. This Masters group, studying Photography and Urban Cultures represents diverse upbringings with experiences in cities ranging from Seoul, Barcelona, Accra, and London.

Freemasons075-EditJune CadoganJune Cadogan-1Image by June Cadogan from her project Brethren

As a student on this course, I leave the year with strong walking legs and nerdy knowledge of cameras. I listen to the projects of my classmates Silvia Andrademarin and June Cadogan, equally wanting to spend copious amounts of time in Crisps Street Market to the Masonic lodges of Harrow; watching, walking, listening, and snapping away. I dream of new theoretical friends, Ingold, Massey, and Appurdurai whom I’ve met along the way in my classes.

This year of study has armed me to re-thinkand re-lookat city networks and the movement of its people.

silvia3Image by Silvia Andrademarin from her project Chrisp Street Market

I and my fellowadventure nerds will be showing our projects in the exhibition Habitus, which is part of the Urban Photofest, London. Exhibitor Mattias Malk who has a trifecta of exhibition duties ranging from curating, exhibiting, tells me his understanding of the illustrious word Habitus. He states,

What makes habitat elusive is that by its very nature we do not consciously register it. Only when distanced from the habitus does one begin to notice its inner workings. Therefore habitus defines all the work in the exhibition. As urban sociologists, our research works at unraveling notions and histories that are overlooked, pass unnoticed, neglected or suppressed and begin to understand their inner mechanisms.

The projects in the exhibition run the gamut of research topics such as community, urban redevelopment, family history, tourism, and globalization. They have taken us locally and internationally, allowing us to gain understanding of urban spaces. Our research, though undertaken independently is a culmination of our collective work and creative engagement with each other this year.

When thinking of acts of collectivity behind the work in Habitus, I think about the time spent with each other inside and outside the classroom. On different occasions, we went on walks to Brighton, Deptford, and Istanbul. Walking allowed us to build trust and get to know each other, but also engage in the urban environment and ask questions. While walking, we shared our knowledge in an array of subjects, such as architecture, photography, journalism, and education.

20140518_brighton_puc_022_900pxPUC Student, Gill Golding leading class on walk in Brighton. Image by Andy Day

This approach of walking, photographing, and coming together allowed the group to synthesize our experience, classroom learnings, and group expertise.

Our current show, Habitus which takes place between October 20th-25th at the Menier Gallery in London is a result of the group’s collective effort.

Our mission statement for the show : Through the connection of theory, practice and discussion the participants have engaged in core themes of urban cultures and this exhibition is visual manifestation of the collective dialogue.

For more information about the artists and the show visit our facebook page Habitus and our website www.habitusphoto.co.uk and check out www.urbanphotofest.org for all the events happening in the festival.

Habitus’ is part of London’s Urban Photofest.

The private view is on Saturday, October 25th from 6pm-10pm

at the Menier Gallery, 51 Southwark St, London SE1 1RU.

Opening Times

Monday 20th- 2pm-6pm

Tuesday 21st

Wednesday 24th 11-6pm

Thurday 23rd: 11am-6pm

Friday 24th-11am-8pm

Saturday 25th: 11am- 10pm

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Urban Photo Fest – 24-28 October 2014

upf_poster_14_WEBUrban Photo Fest  explores themes relating to the city, in particular, notions of movement and urban change and is run by artists, theorists and researchers and includes a conference, a master-class, workshops, exhibitions and walks. The Festival will take place over 5 days in  venues across London and Brighton.  

The festival kicks off with the annual Urban Encounters conference -Movement/Mobilities/Migration, which examines and reflects on the nature of the ebb and flow of city life. The conference, held at Tate Britain, will include a keynote address on 24th October by artist and academic Xavier Ribas. 

Other highlights of the festival include photographer and former President of Magnum, Peter Marlow hosting a Visual Storytelling master-class;  In addition, exhibitions during UPF include ‘Movement’ (Silverprint Gallery), the inaugural exhibition from members of the Association of Urban Photographers and ‘Habitus’ (Menier Gallery), an exhibition by Goldsmiths students on the MA Photography and Urban Cultures course. A third exhibition, ‘Close to Nowhere’ (Greenwich Gallery), a 10 year photographic project by Paul Halliday, Creative Director of Urban Photo Fest will close the festival.

For further information on the festival programme, please visit the website at www.urbanphotofest.org/

For information and booking for the Urban Encounters Conference http://www.tate.org.uk/whats-on/tate-britain/conference/urban-encounters-2014-movementsmobilitiesmigrations

Enquiries on the festival contact PR and Marketing Co-ordinator June Cadogan. june@junecadogan.com or call 07919 386116

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Arts-based Research in Johannesburg: A conversation on time, practice and place

Bettina Malcomess, (University of Witswatersrand, Johannesburg, will be in conversation with Alison Rooke and Christian Von Wissell, (CUCR, Goldsmiths) on Friday 17th October at 4pm in RHB137, Goldsmiths College, London.

 Screen Shot 2014-10-11 at 16.51.21

Art process and practice offer the potential to can make apparent of the complexity of the everydayness of urban life.  Focusing on South African cities the speakers will discuss the significance of time and duration in creative processes and cultural policy.


Bettina Malcomess has been involved in a long term, investigation into Johannesburg, working with the numerous representations of the city in historical writing, urban theory, film, media and fiction. Her book Not No Place. Johannesburg, Fragments of Spaces and Times (co-authored with Dorothee Kreutzfeldt) presents a collection of moments in the city’s complex history, its contemporary spatial realities as well as its future projections. 


Alison Rooke and Christian von Wissel will discuss their research into Nine Urban Biotopes. (9UB) an international artistic residency exchange programme between South African and European cities. Driven by funding imperatives and project architecture, the 9UB socially-engaged artists undertook short-term residencies that responded to the specifics social and cultural context of South African cities. This required that they worked ‘from the middle’, in their making sense of the local whilst depending on co-operation , hospitality and  trust.


 Dr Alison Rooke is co-director of CUCR. a.rooke@gold.ac.uk

Christian Von Wissel is a PhD Candidate in Visual Sociology at Goldsmiths College, London and teaching assistant at Munich Technological Univerisity. (TUM) wissel@citambulos.net


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

‪#‎Umbrella Movement by Stefanie Lai

umbrella man twitter(source: Twitter @ HKFS1958)

The humble umbrella has become a symbol of the pro-democracy movement in Hong Kong. The image , dubbed the ‘umbrella man’, emerged as an iconic image of the protests early on, and has been compared to the ‘tank man’ photo from June 4th. His importance has drawn my attention to the umbrella as an object and as a symbol.

The umbrella as quintessentially Hong Kong or Chinese?

In recent years, Hong Kong has followed popular trends in Japan and China and many women use umbrellas not only for protection from the rain, but also from the sun. Moving to the UK from Hong Kong, I was struck by the difference in attitudes towards the sun and rain, specifically what seemed like reluctance by the British to use umbrellas in all but the heaviest rain. Therefore I see the umbrella, used by Hong Kong people rain or shine, or in recent days even as temporary shelter, as an item very rich in local flavour.

The umbrella as a shield, or a weapon…

The reason the umbrella has been so endearing is its simplicity, domesticity and even fragility. A piece of technology that has not changed for hundreds of years, it is being welded in Hong Kong against riot shields and chemical (admittedly non-lethal) weapons. For days the clear inequality of the strengths of the apparatus used by protestors compared to police has captured the attention of the media and produced amazing images. Some Facebook friends of mine who are in the police have started hitting back on the internet, saying ‘how would you feel if you were attacked with the point of an umbrella?’, in justifying the use of tear gas. However, when comparing tear gas and a pointy umbrella, the social and symbolic context of the weapons are more powerful than the potential for injury—anyone might poke themselves with an umbrella any day, or get hit by one in a particularly unlucky moment, but tear gas and pepper spray are much more frightening in their unfamiliarity and association with force.

London umbrella(photo by Stefanie Lai, London 01 Oct, 2014)

The umbrella as a symbol?

The umbrella as a symbol has been surprisingly slow to be popularly adopted as representative of the pro-democracy movement. I myself felt a sense of ambiguity when attending the pro-democracy rally in support of the Hong Kong protests outside the Chinese Embassy in London on Oct 1st: I brought an umbrella but did not use it, and I also found it odd to the standing under someone else’s open umbrella on a clear and mild evening. Perhaps umbrellas are too passive, they are tools of shelter from nature and the elements whereas what Hong Kong people are fighting against is an unnatural, non-humanitarian absolutist power. Umbrellas are also part of a bad-luck myth, but that’s really just for the superstitious.

No one can yet predict the outcome of the demonstrations and the situation in Hong Kong is changing by the hour. However if the image of the umbrella does endure, it will be because protesters are successful in staging a movement that is restrained, non-violent, widespread and could change the course of history, just like the humble umbrella.

Stefanie Lai recently completed MA World Cities and Urban Life at Goldsmiths College. She has lived in Hong Kong and London, is interested in mobilities, especially cycling and walking in the city, and has recently been experimenting with photography.


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Video Methods : Social Science Research in Motion

To celebrate the publication of Video Methods : Social Science Research in Motion (Routledge 2014),     http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9780415734011/   Charlotte Bates has opened a new online space.

It was evident from the start that what would be missing from a book on video methods is the video. Its colour, sound, and movement resist the black and white pages of print. But something lingers in the words and stills within, a feeling of and for the vital, affective, fleeting, and sensuous intensities of video. And this is precisely why the authors of the chapters that encompass this volume have chosen to work with video as a research method. Placing video cameras between themselves and the worlds they are interested in, they have found new ways of recording and attending to the textures and rhythms of social life in motion. From video diaries and go-alongs to time-lapse video, multi-angle video recording, video ethnography, and documentary, with camera phones, minicams, handycams, and digital SLRs, as well as lapel and shotgun microphones, field recorders, batteries, tripods, and head mounts, and in homes and schools, at train stations, on bicycles and kayaks, and in the wilderness, the chapters in this volume provide an innovative and inventive inventory of the possibilities that video has opened up within the social sciences.

If you would like to contribute to the ‘more video projects’ collection please get in touch!

Charlotte Bates is a Postdoctoral Research Associate in the Sociology Department at Goldsmiths, University of London, where she also gained her PhD in visual sociology.


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Curating Community and the Value of Agonism by Alison Rooke


As an academic who has been working with arts organisations who do participatory and socially engaged art work with residents and ‘targeted populations’ (such as older people, young people, refugees and estate residents) for over a decade, I have become interested in the conflicting needs and desires which come to bear on these projects. I have carried out numerous evaluations of arts-based interventions, on a scale which spans the local to the global.

In evaluative research, the question of deciding on the criteria by which we might evaluate a project is more than a matter of identifying tools, indicators and producing evidence. Project evaluation is the moment at which the tensions and failures of a project can be either used as opportunities for reflection or ‘dirty secrets’ to be discussed later in informal settings where they are less dangerous and disruptive. However, it is these very tensions and failings which are indicative of the ethical and political dilemmas facing artists and arts organisations delivering participatory and socially engaged art practice.

I organised the AHRC Cultural Value Expert Workshop entitled Curating Community? out of an awareness of a body of literature concerned with the cultural politics surrounding regeneration and gentrification, debates in arts evaluation and my own research into the micro-politics of arts participation. The workshop brought together artists, commissioners, researchers, educationalists and practitioners from community development and range of arts practices including community, socially engaged art practice, participatory theatre and participatory arts with the aim of reflecting on the opportunities and dilemmas facing practitioners working with ‘communities’ in this context of urban regeneration and gentrification. The workshop asked the following questions:

How are forms of ‘community’ instantiated and negated through participatory arts?

Is there scope for making apparent the conflicting positions of stakeholders in arts participation projects?

What are the consequences of such an approach?

What is the ‘community impact’ of participatory arts?

What is its relational significance?

The use of the word ‘curation’ in the workshop title, rooted in the Latin ‘to care’, is an acknowledgement of the arduous and careful affective labour involved in much of this work and, in turn, its affective impact on the practitioners, (often working in precarious and exacting conditions). In London’s context of rapid regeneration some arts practitioners are working on self-initiated and ‘activist’ initiatives, working with, or as part of, communities in critical and creative responses to the effects of regeneration and gentrification such as displacement, the privatisation and securitisation of urban space. Here artists are often making apparent the uneven social consequences of urban development. The desire to ‘curate community’ bringing residents together through creative interventions, emerges from mixed motivations. Public, third and private sector bodies recognise the potential of participatory and socially engaged art as a means to ‘restore the social bond’ (Ranciere 2006; 57) and ‘tighten the space of social relations’ (Bourriaud 2002:15).

In this process ‘socially-engaged’ or ‘participatory’ art practice has become more professionalized (see Hope 2011). Other drivers here include arts organisation’s desire and need to enhance the traditional demographics of gallery audiences through ‘education’ ‘community’ or ‘local’ programming (in part driven by arts policy and accusations of elitism) and the targeting of ‘vulnerable’ groups (refugees, young people, older people, migrant groups, ex-offenders and LGBT groups for example), through participatory processes. Within this strategic approach to working with communities, arts practitioners negotiate complex circumstances, tasked with creating spaces of dialogue and exchange through participatory social programmes in a context of increased socio-economic inequality and population churn.

Due to its dialogical nature, socially engaged practice is particularly suited to agonistic (Mouffe 2007) circumstances. It has the capacity to reveal the on-going, unpredictable, and multiple dialectics between power and resistance. Rather than predictably reproducing an illusion of unity and a ‘cohesive’ and convivial community, socially engaged practice has the potential to mediate and negotiate and make apparent these social contexts and offer what Mouffe describes as an alternative ‘social imaginary’ in their creative response to them. On-going critical exchange and ‘dialogical aesthetic’ (Kester as 2004) between all ‘stakeholders’ often shape a projects’ eventual realisation. Community art projects, funded through agendas which seek to produce democratic outcomes (such as civic awareness, active citizenship, community cohesion, equality, or inclusion), are paradoxical in that these aims must be ‘deconstructed’, and sometimes disrupted in the course of the project if an agonistic approach is to be successful (Mouffe (2007).

An abundance of evidence has demonstrated that participatory art can address social problems, however, an agonistic approach recognises that this may not be in ways that bring about desired behavioural changes as defined by the state, the corporate world or other social bodies not directly involved in the day-to-day lives of those most impacted by, inequality and social injustice. Working creatively with the agonistic aspect of socially engaged and participatory processes art is not a case of merely solving conflict in order to get on with the work of produce a satisfactory output or outcome. Conflicts and problematic issues, or antagonisms are in Mouffe’s words essential ‘impurities’.

It is therefore more a case of finding cultural value in making and maintaining conflict and tension through a collective creative process. However, this flexible, iterative and critical approach is so often at odds with the demands of delivering and evaluating planned projects with predetermined aims, impacts and outputs. Those working in social practice can find themselves in difficult ethical positions, torn between the desire to ‘start from the middle’ navigating the labyrinth of the competing demands and desires of communities and their obligation to satisfy funders and commissioners predetermined aims and objectives of project ‘delivery’. The ability to juggle these demands, cope with periods of chaos, pull a project together and make sense of it critically is one of the under-recognised skills of the socially engaged artists. These complex situations are indicative of the uneasy fit between a tradition of arts participation, which has evolved out of radical practice, as a part of a project of social justice and societal change (Negri 2011; Bruyne and Gielen 2011) and the instrumental deployment of arts participation in urban development on a global scale. It is therefor not surprising that arts practitioners concerned with participative and socially engaged practice find themselves facing complex ethical and political dilemmas. In the ‘Curating Community’ workshop we discussed the viability of developing alternatives to orthodox evaluative frameworks and methodologies which are integral to arts the governmentality of culture. Evaluation could open up an opportunity to reflect on the value and significance of failures, differences and disagreements within a project. Generative and integral approaches to project evaluation, which incorporate the principles of ‘critical friendship’, triangulated peer review and participatory action research, offered ways of unpicking and recognising the cultural value of antagonism and heterogeneity in participatory arts.

Dr Alison Rooke is co-Director of Centre for Urban and Community Research, Goldsmiths College.


A longer report on the AHRC Cultural Value Curating Community Expert Workshop is available on the AHRC Cultural Value site at :


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Art on a Roundabout by Johannes Rigal

Redesign of a local photographic sculpture in Mautern, Austria

01 Status 2003 Gregor Kremser Design, Installation & Images; Photo G. Kremser Status 2003: Gregor Kremser: Design, Installation & Images; Photo: G. Kremser

Mautern is a small town (3494 inhabitants) near Austria´s capital Vienna. Urban life and the art scene are majorly influenced by nearby Vienna and Krems. However, in Mautern itself there has been substantial effort to get out of the shadow of these two cities by producing and offering art and arts education in Mautern itself. One of these efforts was to build a four-sided sculpture made of cubes to present the town in photographs in the middle of a roundabout at Mautern’s entrance. The sculpture was designed by local artist Gregor Kremser and put in place in 2003. The images on the installation were primarily historic images or generally speaking generic images intended to show Mautern.

I was first approached in 2012 by Kremser as plans were developed by the local government and city council to redesign the installation and primarily its photographic content. I had the idea to update the installation with contemporary photographic images showing the town and its citizens.

However, implementing this concept proved to be difficult as local decision makers wanted to use the sculpture for displaying pictures of their respective local groups (sports, music groups, folksy symbols of the region, etc.). Most inhabitants became more and more unhappy with this kind of use of the display. Finally, in 2013, I was commissioned to curate a new exhibit which whould finally implement the original idea, showing modern photography in Mautern, accessible for everyone.

Designing the project I realized quickly that I wasn’t happy as an outsider to come in, take photographs, put them up and leave afterwards, making the project a passive and “non-local” affair. I knew the area, but was far from being “local” as the original artist Kremser is.

A participatory approach, a more direct way to include Mautern and its people in the project was needed. The way to achieve this was to facilitate a VHS (adult education centre) workshop series inviting everyone interested in photography.

The group consisted of non-professional photographers from various backgrounds and ages (between 17 and 70 years) and different interests in photography (e.g. portraits, black and white, family pictures, architecture, macro-photography) which led interesting discussions and ideas among the group.

The most important elements of the workshops were:

- all participants were advised in technical photographic skills matching their respective skills and knowledge.

- participatory approach: an essential element of the project was that I invited everyone in the local community to work out the concept and take the photos themselves. I was merely there as their advisor.

- research on the qualities of a small town like Mautern and portray the edgy and contradictory aspects of a seemingly “wholesome” community.

- walks through the town, each with a special focus (history, movement, built environment, nature, agriculture) which was central for finding the images for the sculpture

Over a series of four 6 hour days, the participants were invited to share their histories of the town and come up with the routes of the walks themselves. This led to interesting situations were the group’s members not only wanted to show me a special corner or their favourite place in the town but started to show each other places that the others were not aware of.

Finally, the group came up with four themes, one for each side of the cube, which were: the Danube, the Romans, landmarks, wine. These themes were developed in a discussion in which it became clear that it was important for the group to have certain things on display – such as the landmarks of Mautern or the wine as the typical product of the region – but that they also had certain ideas in terms of colour, style and aesthetic of the images. They should be representative and of a certain “value”.


 The Roman Wall, Photo: C. Bamberger

03 Wine, Photo K. BrennerWine, Photo: K. Brenner

04 Landmarks, Photo L. MessererLandmarks, Photo: L. Messerer

05 The Danube, Photo M. Kranister The Danube, Photo: M. Kranister

After a pre-selection of the images throughout the workshops, I put together a series of about 30 potential layouts according to the themes:

06 Potential layout �Various 4�, Johannes RigalPotential layout “Various 4”, Johannes Rigal

It was originally intended that the group would choose four of those layouts but in the end, the layouts were cut and the images mixed together from the various layout – a positive outcome not originally intended.

The workshops were held in spring 2013, the new images were put up in 2014.

07 The new images on the installation. Photo Karl RederThe new images on the installation. Photo: Karl Reder

08 Participants in front of the completed sculpture; Photo Karl RederParticipants in front of the completed sculpture; Photo: Karl Reder

The participants not only improved their photographic skills, but also developed more consciousness for the space they live in. The sculpture will have a long-term effect on the community, emphasising its status as a place for modern art and thereby fostering the community´s self confidence in the shadow of Vienna and Krems. Also the inhabitants´ability for critical thinking and analysis were enhanced. Also, this project has shown how important it is to implement participatory approaches in projects like this as it ensures that the former participants feel connected to and responsible for the sculpture long after the project has finished. Another effect that the project had was on a more political level. The sculpture has had its critics from the very first design in 2003. Some people wanted to either use the sculpture for advertisement or commercial display or remove it from its prominent spot altogether. Because the sculpture was redesigned by Mautern’s citizens in our project, these voices of criticism almost had to disappear because now it was a sculpture of public and civic participation.

09 The completed sculpture North Side; Photo Karl RederThe completed sculpture North Side; Photo: Karl Reder

Johannes Rigal is a Visiting Research Fellow at CUCR

johannes.rigal@gmail.com               http://www.johannesrigal.com



Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment